<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for agiler.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agiler.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agiler.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unit tests for callback-driven flow in CS by Jan Dudek</title>
		<link>http://agiler.net/2012/02/unit-tests-for-callback-driven-flow-in-cs/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Dudek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agiler.net/?p=46#comment-122</guid>
		<description>In simple cases you can use jasmine.any():
expect(@usecase.doSmthWith).toHaveBeenCalledWith(jasmine.any(String), &quot;name&quot;)
expect(@usecase.doSmthWith).toHaveBeenCalledWith(jasmine.any(Object), &quot;name&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In simple cases you can use jasmine.any():<br />
expect(@usecase.doSmthWith).toHaveBeenCalledWith(jasmine.any(String), &#8220;name&#8221;)<br />
expect(@usecase.doSmthWith).toHaveBeenCalledWith(jasmine.any(Object), &#8220;name&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Object factories vs. merging new values to fields in JS by Jan Dudek</title>
		<link>http://agiler.net/2012/01/object-factories-vs-merging-new-values-to-fields-in-js/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Dudek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agiler.net/?p=32#comment-116</guid>
		<description>I think parentheses were OK :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think parentheses were OK <img src='http://agiler.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Object factories vs. merging new values to fields in JS by Jan Filipowski</title>
		<link>http://agiler.net/2012/01/object-factories-vs-merging-new-values-to-fields-in-js/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Filipowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agiler.net/?p=32#comment-111</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t done any benchmarks, so maybe this solution is slower, or has huge memory overhead, but I think it&#039;s not important in that context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t done any benchmarks, so maybe this solution is slower, or has huge memory overhead, but I think it&#8217;s not important in that context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Object factories vs. merging new values to fields in JS by Wojtek</title>
		<link>http://agiler.net/2012/01/object-factories-vs-merging-new-values-to-fields-in-js/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Wojtek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agiler.net/?p=32#comment-110</guid>
		<description>So the only disadvantages of the factory here are parentheses and ugly name of the programming pattern?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the only disadvantages of the factory here are parentheses and ugly name of the programming pattern?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

